4

Suicide Squad gets less then stellar reviews
1985   56

  • 0

    Which is actually kind of perplexing.

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • Banned
    0

    35% so far on Rotten Tomatoes.


  • 0

    What's suicide squad?

    Oh wow... Is that what that one thread was about a few months ago? I really thought it was some kind of movement for disgruntled people.


  • SwimNinja
    0

    damn I had high hopes for it.

    Here in Cloud Cuckoo Land, there are no rules: There's no government, no baby sitters, no bedtimes, no frowny faces, no bushy mustaches, and no negativity of any kind. And there's also no consistency.


  • 0

    It has an 8.7 rating from IMDB. It probably warrants a viewing, and it just wouldn't be fair to rush to impetuous conclusions based on a "Rotten Tomatoes" rating. We need to watch it, gather as much review data as we can, and then draw our own conclusions as to the quality of this cinematic work.


  • SwimSuperHero
    1

    I bet it still does better than the new Ghostbusters movie.
    It doesn't matter what Rotten Tomatoes says they have bad taste.

    I only trust IMDb.

    Usopp Fanatic since 2003.


  • 1

    Can't say I'm surprised.

    You called down the thunder. Well, now you've got it!


  • 0

    Rotten Tomatoes gave all of my favorite movies crappy ratings.


  • SwimSuperHero
    0

    Zenigundam said:

    Rotten Tomatoes gave all of my favorite movies crappy ratings.

    That's too bad. I'm still mad at them for giving the new Ghostbusters movie a good score.
    I'll never forgive them for that.

    Usopp Fanatic since 2003.


  • 1

    Yeah they think Hard to Kill is hot garbage (33% Tomatoes). Smh. Haha laughable.


  • 0

    Eh , I really don't listen to anything else but my own judgement .

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • 0

    ...* sigh *

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • 0

    ???


  • 0

    Doesn't mean you can't go see it.

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • 0

    Zenigundam said:

    It has an 8.7 rating from IMDB. It probably warrants a viewing, and it just wouldn't be fair to rush to impetuous conclusions based on a "Rotten Tomatoes" rating. We need to watch it, gather as much review data as we can, and then draw our own conclusions as to the quality of this cinematic work.

    See , this is a fair assessment.

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • 0

    Why thank you, friend.


  • 0

    And i can't say i'm surprised that you're saying that you can't say you're surprised.

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • 2

    And BTW , Hard to kill is gold! GOLD I TELLS YA!

    Monsters come in many shapes and sizes . I'm all of them


  • Banned
    1

    I find it funny that anyone thinks Rotten Tomatoes isn't heavily padded by trollish neckbeard reviews.......#protip, there are millions of those f**kers.

    You were banned. It fills you with determination


  • Banned
    0

    Rotten Tomatoes is used by alot of hipster art elites that like live and breath cinema. I don't put credence in any reviews there. They tend to give Blockbusters ridiculously low ratings in general.


  • Banned
    1

    CyberBully360 said:

    I find it funny that anyone thinks Rotten Tomatoes isn't heavily padded by trollish neckbeard reviews.......#protip, there are millions of those f**kers.

    You have to have at least 3 fedoras to post there I am pretty sure lmao.


Log in to reply